Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01102
Original file (MD04-01102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
                 DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Cpl, USMC
Docket No. MD04-01102

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040625. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to “DIS-INVOL Homosexuality Admission.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel. The Applicant listed Veterans of Foreign Wars as her representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDBR) does not travel, all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The Applicant failed to respond by the deadline date to a letter requiring the Applicant to notify the Naval Discharge Review Board of intention to be present for the requested personal appearance hearing. Therefore, a documentary review was conducted, and the Applicant is not eligible for further review by this Board.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050524.
After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character and reason for the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Discharge involuntarily - Homosexuality - Act (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6207.3b(1).


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “(This was with admin discharge board) at which time the veteran did not admit to thies [ sic ] charges. And did not sign the DD 214.
Veterans was charged that a LT, stated he seen the veteran jump into the lap of a civilian, at a ball game and kiss the said person. At the hearing this person denied that this happened. But do to the LT. statis all that was admitted from the LT after his statement. The LT was let loose from active duty and returned home. At which time he could not be crossed examed. The Board accepted his statement on written notice.”

 Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS):

 2. “Equity Issue(s): The applicant requests that the equity of his discharge be considered in light of mitigating circumstances.

Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVNST 5420.174D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition.

The applicant requests that the Board upgrade her discharge from Other Than Honorable conditions. Her service was Outstanding until the alleged incident transpired that led to her discharge. Despite her admission of homosexuality, she denies that the incident that led to her discharge ever took place and attest that there were other mitigating circumstances that led to her being accused and later discharged. The applicant contends that her General discharge is inequitable in light of her Honorable service while on active duty, prior to the events surrounding her discharge.

The Veterans of Foreign Wars express purpose in providing this statement and any other submittals or evidence filed is t assist this applicant in the clarification and resolution of the impropriety or inequity raised. To that end, we rest assured that the NDRB’s final decision will reflect sound equitable principles consistent in law, regulation, policy and discretion as promulgated by title 10 USC § 1553, and set forth in 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVNST 5420.174D.

This case is now respectfully submitted for deliberation and disposition.”


Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Statement in Support (3 pages)
Statement in Support from Veterans Service Officer

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                851001 - 860310  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 860311               Date of Discharge: 890728

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 04 18
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 22                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 92

 Highest Rank: Cpl                          MOS: 5937

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (8)                       Conduct: 4.2 (8)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: RMB, COC, LOA (7)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Discharge involuntarily - Homosexuality - Admission (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6207.3b(2).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

870811:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Serious consequences that my result from negligent failure to properly perform the duties of a student] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

870824:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: On 0001, 870817 was absent from appointed place of duty, to wit: ARRC 3-87 class and did remain so absent until 0020, at StudCoA, ScolsBn, MCCES, MCAGCC.
         Award: Forfeiture of $189.00 per month for 1 month, restriction for 14 days. Appeal denied 870910.

880503:  Psychological consult comments: Patient has revealed that she is a homosexual. She is comfortable with her sexuality and denies any psychiatric symptomology.

880616:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality.
880616:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

880620:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality.

880803:  Commanding General, 3d Marine Air Wing, directed the Applicant be retained.

880830:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [My failure to be at my appointed place of duty and setting a poor example as an NCO] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
890127:  Applicant's Voluntary Statement made to 1 st Lt K. W. M____ concerning her homosexuality. [Extracted from CO’s message dated 890314].

890314:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by her statement that she admitted to being a homosexual.

890314:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
890314:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality due to admission. The factual basis for this recommendation was the sworn statements made by 1 st Lt K. W. M___ and Cpl M.S. T___ on 890127. Commanding Officer’s comment’s: [Applicant] is being processed for administrative separation under other than honorable conditions based upon the sworn statements of 1stLt M_ and [Applicant]. By her own sworn admission, Cpl T_ frequented known homosexual establishments for the purpose of soliciting homosexual acts. Based on this open and public pursuit of a homosexual lifestyle, the characterization of service as OTH is established

890501:  An Administrative Discharge Board, by unanimous vote, found that the allegations set forth in the notice of proposed separation are supported by a preponderance of evidence.

890622:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

890623:  Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality - admission.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19890728 under other than honorable conditions for homosexuality - act (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issues 1-2. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a public homosexual act as determined by an administrative discharge board and witnessed by a commissioned officer. The Applicant was also subject to nonjudicial punishment proceedings for a violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her willful failure to meet the requirements of her contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of her characterization of service. Additionally, the summary of service clearly documents that a homosexual act was the reason the Applicant was discharged. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant contends that she disputed the allegations against her at her administrative discharge board and that the allegations were accepted because of the lieutenant’s “statis.” The statements provided by the Applicant do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The administrative discharge board determined, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, that the Applicant committed a homosexual act. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for her conduct or that she should not be held accountable for her action. Relief denied.

The following if provided for the edification of the Applicant. The NDRB has no authority to provided additional review of this case since Applicant’s discharge occurred more than 15 years ago. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of naval service, if she desires further review of her case.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective
27 Jun 1989 until 17 August 1995, Paragraph 6207, HOMOSEXUALITY

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00917

    Original file (MD99-00917.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    810307: Additional notification for administrative discharge whereby applicant advised of the recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions because: (1) such homosexual conduct violated the customary Marine superior-subordinate relationships; and (2) that the acts were committed aboard a Marine Corps camp during time of war, and such misconduct had an adverse impact on discipline, good order or morale of the unit.910312: Applicant waived the Administrative Board,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00029

    Original file (MD00-00029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. In the absence of such evidence the Board must presume that the Administrative Discharge Board fairly considered this issue and made the appropriate determination. The fact that the applicant had a prior honorable discharge, and had combat experience has no bearing on his discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00854

    Original file (MD00-00854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During my time as a Marine, I never had any other problems, and in all ways but one was an exemplary Marine, Please reconsider the decision not to characterize my service performance and declare it as being Honorable. 941122: GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality admission. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00293

    Original file (MD00-00293.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall change to: HONORABLE /Discharge involuntarily - Homosexuality - Admission (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6207.3b(2).The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 930730 under honorable conditions (general) for homosexuality - admission (A). ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00460

    Original file (MD03-00460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 911126: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed homosexuality acts, and that such acts warranted separation, and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). an Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, found that the Applicant had...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00324

    Original file (ND02-00324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00324 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. 980105: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct admission.980324: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00306

    Original file (MD04-00306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for discharge be changed to “Red. Along with the fairness in hiring issues I listed above, I also wish to have the type of discharge and narraration changed because it will eventually have a severly negative effect on my family (especially my children). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00857

    Original file (MD01-00857.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. Recommend discharge with characterization of service as General (under honorable conditions).870205: Commanding officer recommended discharge with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of homosexuality. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0323 14

    Original file (NR0323 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her RE-4 (not recommended for. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600276

    Original file (ND0600276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214Letter to Applicant from Department of Veterans Affairs, dtd August 19, 2005 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20020130 - 20020505 COGActive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20020506 Date of Discharge: 20040225 Length of Service...